Signature Sponsor
US Coal Generation Surges During Winter Storm Fern Crisis

 

 

February 1, 2026 - US coal generation during Winter Storm Fern revealed critical insights about America's electricity infrastructure vulnerabilities during extreme weather events. The operational response demonstrated coal's unique position within America's generation portfolio, with output surging from approximately 70 GWh daily in mid-January to roughly 130 GWh daily during peak storm conditions. This near-doubling of coal generation capacity occurred whilst natural gas generation increased by only 14% during the same period, highlighting fundamental differences in emergency response capabilities between fuel sources.

The crisis exposed how extreme weather creates cascading failures across multiple energy systems simultaneously. Furthermore, it demonstrated the interconnected nature of energy transition challenges facing modern grid operators during periods of peak demand and constrained supply.

Coal's Strategic Baseload Advantages During Crisis Periods

Coal-fired generation offers distinct operational advantages during extreme weather events that stem from its fuel storage characteristics. Unlike natural gas infrastructure, which depends on pipeline networks vulnerable to freeze-offs and residential heating priority allocation, coal plants maintain on-site fuel inventories that cannot be redirected for competing uses during supply crunches.

The 31% increase in coal generation during Winter Storm Fern represents the activation of existing capacity rather than new construction. This indicates that coal units remain operationally ready despite ongoing retirement discussions. Consequently, this dispatchability advantage becomes particularly valuable when alternative fuel sources face supply constraints.

During the storm period, multiple factors favoured coal deployment:

• Fuel security: On-site coal stockpiles eliminate pipeline dependency
• Price stability: Coal costs remain relatively stable during gas price spikes
• Rapid activation: Existing units can increase output within hours
• Weather resistance: Coal handling systems generally withstand extreme cold

Emergency Authorisation Protocols Across Regional Grid Operators

The Department of Energy's Section 202(c) emergency orders during Winter Storm Fern revealed the regulatory framework governing crisis response across multiple Regional Transmission Organizations. ISO New England and PJM Interconnection received authorisations through Saturday, whilst the New York ISO obtained approvals through Monday, indicating both the geographic scope and temporal duration of grid stress conditions.

These emergency orders temporarily suspend Clean Air Act compliance requirements. They allow generators to operate beyond normal environmental limits when reliability is threatened. The fact that orders were issued across three separate RTOs simultaneously demonstrates that Winter Storm Fern created system-wide rather than localised stress, requiring coordinated response across interconnected grid regions.

The emergency dispatch decision-making process involves complex cost-benefit calculations. Moreover, these calculations compare operating costs of higher-emission backup generation against environmental compliance trade-offs during crisis periods.

Table: Generation Source Reliability Rankings During Winter Storms

Critical Infrastructure Vulnerabilities Exposed by Extreme Weather

Winter Storm Fern revealed fundamental weaknesses in America's generation portfolio that extend beyond simple capacity shortages. The crisis demonstrated how weather events create cascading failures across multiple energy systems simultaneously, forcing grid operators to activate increasingly expensive and environmentally problematic backup resources.

In addition, the event highlighted the growing importance of critical minerals and energy security in maintaining grid stability during extreme conditions.

Natural Gas System Constraints and Price Volatility

The most dramatic vulnerability emerged in natural gas markets, where spot prices reached an all-time high of $30.565/MMBtu during peak storm conditions. This represents a staggering increase compared to the $2.20/MMBtu average price in 2024 and the projected $4.90/MMBtu for 2026. Consequently, this created a 6.2-fold increase over projected annual averages.

This price explosion resulted from multiple converging factors:

• Pipeline freeze-offs: Water vapour in natural gas lines formed hydrate crystals, restricting flow
• Residential heating priority: Contractual and regulatory frameworks prioritise home heating over electricity generation
• Supply-demand mismatch: Extreme cold increased consumption whilst reducing available supply
• Storage depletion: Regional LNG and stored gas inventories faced rapid drawdown

The price volatility directly transmitted to electricity markets, particularly in New England where electricity prices are closely tied to natural gas pricing. This coupling creates a transmission mechanism where fuel market disruptions immediately impact retail electricity costs. Furthermore, it amplifies economic stress during crisis periods, demonstrating the need for effective market volatility hedging strategies. 

Weather-Dependent Generation Performance Decline

Whilst coal and natural gas dominated headlines during Winter Storm Fern, renewable energy sources experienced predictable but significant output declines. Solar, wind, and hydropower contributions all decreased during the storm week compared to the previous period, though the magnitude varied by technology and regional conditions.

According to Wind and Solar Performance During Winter Storm Fern, renewable sources faced multiple operational challenges during extreme weather conditions.

Solar Generation Challenges:

  • Heavy cloud cover reduced incident solar radiation by 80-95%
  • Snow accumulation blocked panel surfaces
  • Reduced daylight hours during winter storm conditions
  • Ice formation on tracking systems prevented optimal positioning

Wind Generation Variability:

  • Extreme wind speeds may exceed turbine operational limits
  • Ice formation on turbine blades disrupts aerodynamic efficiency
  • Grid integration challenges during rapidly changing wind patterns
  • Maintenance access limitations during severe weather

Long-Term Energy Security and Strategic Planning Implications

The recurring pattern of extreme weather events requiring emergency coal deployment raises fundamental questions about America's energy transition strategy. Similar coal mobilisation occurred during severe cold snaps in February 2021 and January 2025, establishing a five-year pattern of weather-driven reliability challenges that suggest structural rather than anomalous vulnerabilities.

This pattern underscores the importance of oil price movements and their impact on backup generation economics during crisis periods.

Coal Fleet Retirement versus Grid Reliability Trade-offs

The strategic value demonstrated by US coal generation during Winter Storm Fern complicates ongoing retirement planning for ageing coal plants. Grid operators face competing pressures between environmental objectives and reliability requirements, particularly as extreme weather events become more frequent and severe.

Key factors influencing coal retirement decisions include:

• Emergency capacity value: Coal plants provide dispatchable backup during crisis periods
• Fuel security advantages: On-site storage eliminates supply chain vulnerabilities
• Infrastructure replacement costs: Retiring coal requires alternative backup capacity investment
• Regulatory compliance burden: Environmental requirements increase operating costs
• Market design limitations: Capacity markets may not adequately compensate reliability services

The challenge lies in quantifying the economic value of insurance capacity that operates infrequently but provides critical services during extreme events. Traditional market mechanisms often undervalue reliability services because they focus on energy production rather than availability during crisis periods.

Investment Patterns in Weather-Resilient Technologies

Winter Storm Fern's impact patterns are driving investment toward technologies and infrastructure designs that maintain performance during adverse conditions. These investments span multiple categories, from incremental improvements to existing systems to revolutionary approaches for grid resilience.

Dual-Fuel Capability Development:
The success of oil-fired generation during Winter Storm Fern, where petroleum became the predominant energy source in New England from midday Saturday to early Monday morning, demonstrates the value of fuel flexibility. Generators operating dual-fuel plants could switch away from natural gas when prices spiked or supplies became constrained for residential heating customers.

This operational flexibility comes at significant capital cost but provides valuable hedge against fuel market disruptions. Investment trends include:

• Converting existing natural gas plants to dual-fuel capability
• Installing on-site oil storage systems for emergency use
• Developing contracts for emergency fuel delivery during crisis periods
• Upgrading control systems for rapid fuel switching

Energy Storage Deployment as Weather Hedge:
Battery storage investments offer potential solutions for bridging short-term supply disruptions. However, their effectiveness during extended extreme weather events remains limited by current technology constraints. Storage deployment strategies increasingly focus on:

• Geographic distribution to reduce weather correlation risks
• Integration with renewable resources for improved capacity factors
• Pairing with traditional generation for enhanced reliability
• Development of longer-duration storage technologies

Winter Storm Fern's impact on generation patterns highlights fundamental challenges in how electricity markets price reliability services during extreme weather. Current market structures often fail to capture the full economic value of maintaining dispatchable generation capacity that operates infrequently but provides critical services during crisis periods.

Capacity Market Evolution for Extreme Weather Resilience

Regional Transmission Organizations face increasing pressure to modify capacity market designs to better compensate generation resources for weather-related reliability services. The emergency deployment of coal generation during Winter Storm Fern demonstrates that existing capacity markets may undervalue the insurance function provided by dispatchable resources.

PJM Interconnection Challenges:
PJM's capacity market has struggled to adequately compensate coal plants for their emergency reliability services, contributing to accelerated retirement schedules. The 31% coal generation increase during Winter Storm Fern occurred within PJM territory, highlighting the disconnect between market compensation and operational value during crisis periods.

ISO New England Innovations:
ISO New England has developed winter reliability products that provide additional compensation for generators maintaining fuel inventories during winter months. This market design innovation recognises the specific value of stored fuel during periods when pipeline constraints limit natural gas availability.

Fuel Security Premium Calculations

The price differential between natural gas at $30.565/MMBtu and coal at stable pricing during Winter Storm Fern demonstrates the economic value of fuel security during crisis periods. This differential provides a framework for calculating appropriate capacity premiums for generation resources with superior fuel security characteristics.

Economic analysis suggests that coal plants providing emergency reliability services during extreme weather events should receive capacity payments reflecting their fuel security value. This premium calculation must account for:

• Probability-weighted expected value of emergency deployment
• Cost differential between secure and vulnerable fuel sources
• Infrastructure investment required to maintain emergency capability
• Environmental compliance costs during emergency operations

Investment Opportunities in Weather-Resilient Infrastructure

The operational patterns revealed during Winter Storm Fern are creating investment opportunities across multiple sectors of the electricity infrastructure system. These opportunities span traditional utility investments, emerging technology deployments, and innovative financial products designed to hedge weather-related risks.

Infrastructure Hardening Investment Themes

The vulnerability of natural gas infrastructure to freeze-offs during Winter Storm Fern is driving investment toward weatherisation and hardening measures across the energy supply chain. These investments aim to reduce the correlation between extreme weather events and system failures that force reliance on emergency generation resources.

Transmission System Winterisation:
Grid operators are investing in transmission infrastructure upgrades designed to maintain functionality during extreme weather conditions. Key investment areas include:

• Conductor and hardware upgrades for ice and wind loading
• Substation equipment rated for extreme temperature operation
• Enhanced vegetation management in transmission corridors
• Improved weather monitoring and forecasting systems

Generation Fleet Fuel Security Enhancements:
The success of coal and oil-fired generation during Winter Storm Fern is driving investment in fuel security measures across the generation fleet:

• On-site fuel storage expansion at existing plants
• Dual-fuel conversion projects for natural gas facilities
• Emergency fuel delivery system development
• Weatherisation of fuel handling equipment

Technology Solutions for Weather-Dependent Operations

Advanced technology deployment offers potential solutions for managing grid operations during extreme weather events more effectively than traditional approaches. These technologies focus on improving forecasting accuracy, optimising resource dispatch, and enhancing system coordination during crisis periods.

Advanced Weather Forecasting Integration:
Investment in sophisticated weather forecasting and grid modelling systems enables better preparation for extreme weather events. These systems provide:

• Probabilistic forecasting of generation resource availability
• Integration of weather data with economic dispatch algorithms
• Early warning systems for potential reliability challenges
• Scenario modelling for emergency response planning

Regional Adaptation Strategies and Market Dynamics

Different regions of the United States face varying combinations of weather risks, generation portfolios, and regulatory frameworks that influence their adaptation strategies for extreme weather events. Winter Storm Fern's impact across multiple regions revealed both common vulnerabilities and region-specific challenges.

New England's Unique Energy Security Challenges

New England's experience during Winter Storm Fern highlighted the region's particular vulnerability to natural gas supply disruptions and dependence on imported fuels. The fact that oil-fired generation surpassed natural gas as the predominant energy source during peak storm conditions reflects both the region's infrastructure constraints and its strategic fuel diversity.

LNG Import Dependency and Storage Constraints:
New England's reliance on liquefied natural gas imports creates vulnerability to both weather-related delivery disruptions and global LNG market volatility. Key challenges include:

• Limited pipeline capacity from domestic gas production regions
• Dependence on LNG tanker deliveries that may be delayed by weather
• Finite storage capacity requiring careful inventory management
• Competition with European and Asian LNG markets during crisis periods

The region's strategic fuel oil reserves provided critical backup during Winter Storm Fern. However, this approach raises questions about long-term sustainability as oil-fired generation faces environmental pressure and higher operating costs compared to cleaner alternatives.

Texas Grid Lessons and Reliability Improvements

Whilst Winter Storm Fern affected Texas within ERCOT territory, the state's experience differs significantly from the February 2021 Winter Storm Uri crisis that caused widespread blackouts. The operational improvements implemented since 2021 appear to have enhanced winter reliability, though the full effectiveness of these measures requires continued evaluation.

ERCOT Generation Adequacy Improvements:
Since the 2021 winter crisis, ERCOT has implemented multiple measures designed to improve generation availability during extreme weather:

• Mandatory weatherisation requirements for natural gas facilities
• Enhanced coordination between gas and electric system operators
• Improved winter emergency operating procedures
• Expanded deployment of demand response programmes

The fact that Winter Storm Fern did not produce the same scale of disruption in Texas suggests these measures provided some effectiveness. However, the storm's characteristics differed from the 2021 event.

Frequently Asked Questions About Emergency Power Generation

Why did US coal generation during Winter Storm Fern increase so dramatically?

US coal generation during Winter Storm Fern increased 31% because coal plants offer unique advantages during extreme weather that other generation sources cannot match. Coal facilities maintain large on-site fuel inventories that remain available regardless of transportation disruptions or competing demand from other sectors.

When natural gas pipeline systems experienced freeze-offs and residential heating demand consumed available gas supplies, grid operators activated coal plants as their most reliable dispatchable backup resource. The 31% increase represented activation of existing coal capacity rather than emergency construction, demonstrating that coal infrastructure remains operationally ready despite ongoing retirement discussions.

How do grid operators decide which power plants to activate during emergencies?

Grid operators use sophisticated economic dispatch algorithms that consider multiple factors when determining which generation resources to activate during emergency conditions. During Winter Storm Fern, decision-making prioritised reliability over cost optimisation, leading to activation of higher-cost but more reliable generation sources.

Key decision factors include fuel availability and security, operational reliability, ramp rate capabilities, regional transmission constraints, and environmental compliance flexibility. The process involves continuous coordination between regional transmission organisations, individual utilities, and fuel supply companies to ensure adequate resources remain available throughout crisis periods.

What role do emergency federal orders play in winter grid operations?

Department of Energy Section 202(c) emergency orders provide critical regulatory flexibility that allows grid operators to maintain reliability during extreme weather events. These orders temporarily suspend certain environmental compliance requirements when continued operation of specific generation resources is necessary to prevent blackouts.

During Winter Storm Fern, emergency orders were issued for ISO New England, PJM Interconnection, and the New York ISO. These orders allowed continued operation of backup generation regardless of normal emissions limits. Emergency orders represent a last-resort regulatory tool that balances environmental protection objectives with immediate grid reliability needs.

Ready to Identify the Next Major Energy Infrastructure Investment?

Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model delivers real-time notifications on significant ASX mineral discoveries, including critical energy transition metals and infrastructure commodities that power grid resilience projects. With historic discoveries demonstrating substantial returns for early investors, subscribers gain immediate access to actionable opportunities in the evolving energy landscape, from battery metals to strategic infrastructure materials essential for grid modernisation.